most
highly cultivated ab intra of all Dravidian idioms, can dispense with
its Sanskrit altogether, if need be, and not only stand alone, but flourish
without its aid.”1
All
the pre-Aryan Tamil literature, technical as well as general, displaying
perfect, purity of word and thought, have been destroyed. Even the earliest
extant Tamil literature is enough to prove the complete independence of
Tamil language and literature from Sanskrit. The linking of the Tamil
language, Music and Drama together as Muttami‰,
‘threefold Tamil,’ the division of Grammar into Orthography, Accidence
and Syntax, and that which comprises classification of literary themes
Prosody and Rhetoric; the division of subject-matter into Aham (Erotic)
and Puram (non-Erotic); the five fold geographical treatment of erotic
poems as Kurinji (hill-side), Mullai (pastoral regioŒ,
Marudam (agricultural regioŒ, Neydal (littoral),
and Pƒlai (desert); the four principal metres,
viz., Ve-bƒ, ƒsiriyappƒ,
Kalippƒ and Va½jippƒ
and their varieties, not to speak of the various allied and auxiliary
metres; the eightfold classification of poetic works, each class called
by the common name Vanappu, into Ammai, A‰agu,
To‹mai, T†l,
Virundu, Iyaibu, Pula‹, and I‰aibu;
the 20 types of simple rhythm described by Tolkappiyam, the 100 types
of complex rhythm described by Avinayam, and the numerous types of technical
rhythm displayed by Arunagirinather; are all peculiar to Tamil.
(v)
Material for reconstruction of Ancient Dravidian History furnished
by Tamil alone
The
traditional account of the Three Tamil Academies, the references to the
river PahŠu˜i
(in Silappadikƒram and PuŠam),
the enumeration by Adiyƒrkkunallƒr
of the 49 regions forming a great part of the submerged Pandiyanadu, short
notices of some Pandiyas of the First Academy found in Tamil literature
and the like, are, in the absence of a regular history, valuable materials
for reconstructing the ancient history of the Dravidians, at least in
very broad outlines, whereas there is nothing of the kind in all the literatures
of the other Dravidian languages.
1.Ibid,p.45.
|