The work on the Lexicon commenced in Jan.1913,
and dragged on to the very end of 1939, i.e., for a pretty long period
of 27 years. The total cost of production of the Lexicon has come to more
than Rs. 4,10,000. Yet, it is not a work worthy of its subject and a publication
worthy of the University, commensurate with the labour and money expended.
It is true that the Lexicon has made an
advance on the previous exicons in some respects, but, considering the
gravity and magnitude of the defects of the Lexicon in regard to certain
vitual features of lexicography, it is not to be commended as a stupendous
achievement but to be condemned as the most unscientific dictionary ever
produced by a University, an outrage upon the Tamil language, literature
and culture and a colossal waste of public funds.
Since the publication of the Lexicon Supplement,
I have been criticising the Lexicon both on the platform and in the press.
In the year 1955, I published a booklet in English enumerating and amply
illustrating almost all the defects and errors of the Lexicon and submitted
it as an open report to the Syndicate of the Madras University. Having
had no response, I again, published a brochure of the same nature in 1961,
but this time in Tamil, and submitted it to the same body, and also distributed
copies of the same among the chief professors of Tamil and leaders of
outstanding political parties. It has called forth no response in the
breast of anybody so far. This reflects well the social and intellectual
condition of the present-day Tamilians.
The
defects of the Lexicon are sevenfold, and ramify into nearly forty varieties
on the whole, as follows:
1.
Defects relating to words |
(1)
|
Inexhaustiveness
of vocabulary. |
(2)
|
Absence
of alternate forms of nouns. |
(3) |
Absence of idiomatic parts of verbs. |
(4) |
Non-treatment
of components of compound words in their individual
form. |
|